Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lianne Spiderbaby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lianne Spiderbaby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP is not a tabloid. DGG ( talk ) 16:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability requires more than attending the Oscars as the guest of a famous director. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant standalone notability, bio created obviously because of association with Tarantino. Redirect not indicated. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Here's the big issue: she hasn't gotten a lot of attention before appearing on the red carpet with Tarantino. I am finding sources that discuss her, but the rub is that the sources that talk about her are also places she works with. There is the STYD source, but that's the only one I was able to find that would show notability. We do have the red carpet articles, but that's not really enough to show notability in the long run because she's only mentioned in relation to her boyfriend. She's someone that would probably be usable as a RS, but she doesn't meet notability guidelines at this point in time. There is the potential of her gaining more chatter once her book releases, but we can't keep the article based on that because we can't guarantee that. I have no problem with someone userfying the article, but what we have here is someone who is popular, but is really only known within her specific niche. The only people who really report on her are predominantly those who have hired her, which eliminates those places as RS, not that there are that many articles about her out there. She's popular, but popularity does not equal out to notability here on Wikipedia.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Just as Tokyogirl79 says, she is only mentioned by sources like Fangoria that she's associated with, and in conjunction with Tarantino; there's no independent notability. squibix (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.