Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light+building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 07:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Light+building

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (prattle) @ 21:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably notable. The real name of the event seems to be in German. If someone could figure it out and provide some sources then certainly keep. If the article stays as it is, delete. Borock (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: The largest trade fair about architectural lighting and building technology on this planet. Overwhelming coverage in every industry publication ([1][2][3]), and significant coverage in many general publications ([4][5]). While the sourcing could be improved, the article clearly states why it is notable, and that rationale is easily verified. --Latebird (talk) 19:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.