Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilashah
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 07:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Lilashah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My PROD was declined (properly) as the article had been sent to AfD under a different title, but that discussion 9 years ago closed as no consensus, and there is still no evidence of notability. He is mentioned in connection with Asaram, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Delete. Vanamonde (talk) 04:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:35, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheMagnificentist 15:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheMagnificentist 15:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.