Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilt (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lilt (company)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMOTIONAL article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, United States of America, and California. DreamRimmer (talk) 01:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and remove promo content. articles already linked provide SIGCOV Jack4576 (talk) 01:45, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every source in this article is WP:ROUTINE. Care to provide sources that both focus entirely on the company and thoroughly examine it? Nythar (💬-🍀) 02:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Axios and SaaS Industry are not routine

"focus entirely on the company and thorough examination" is plainly not the guideline or threshold Jack4576 (talk) 05:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: This article is written like an advertisement. It is now gone. CastJared (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CastJared What do you mean by It is now gone? AncientWalrus (talk) 19:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Means it's removed. Like the promo writting. CastJared (talk) 03:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as promo content has been removed. It is notable per SIGCOV in reliable sources that goes beyond routine. AncientWalrus (talk) 10:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It seems to me that the article should be left for revision and removal of the promotional text. --Loewstisch (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It appears that the promotional content has been removed, and that the listed sources are sufficient for crossing the notability threshold. Sal2100 (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.