Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilug (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 01:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Lilug

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Lilug
• Articles for deletion/Lilug (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Lilug (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable non-profit organization. Of the three references presented in the article, two are from the group's own site, and the third does not discuss the group at all, only tangentially mentioning it. I searched for additional sources, both under its acronym as well as under its full name, and came up with nothing that could be used. The utter lack of in-depth information in reliable sources is a pretty clear case of this group failing the WP:GNG. The article was previously nominated for deletion way back in 2006, and reached a "No Consensus" decision. However, the arguments for Keep were non-policy statements of "Its important" which would not fly today. Rorshacma (talk) 16:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Linux user group. I can't see how it can be notable, there are so many of them. scope_creep^Talk 09:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete for sheer lack of sources to support notability.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.