Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Rae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Rae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, and the main band mentioned (Fightmilk)) was deleted for non-notability some time ago JetBlind (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The blogs mentioned are all minor - looks like a vanity page.Guardiancats (talk) 02:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources way below the level of being reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For not meeting WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Coverage of her as an individual is very lacking, as mentioned above. She doesn't meet any of the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO: although she's been associated with notable bands, it is only in comparatively minor roles and she's not done anything noteworthy as a solo performer. Even if Fightmilk was notable, she still wouldn't be separately notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:36, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources for her to meet WP:GNG, and she pretty clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO.PohranicniStraze (talk) 23:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.