Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Robbins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nancy Rue. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Robbins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author and book have no Wikipedia pages therefore not notable. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 17:08, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I agree that the stub certainly does not give the impression that there is any notability here, I wonder why you didn't PROD this instead of immediately going to AfD 7 min after the article was created by a rather new editor. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of an article ≠ lack of notability. That being said, a preliminary Google search indicates that the author might meet our notability standards. I'm going to do some more looking in that direction (with the idea that if the author is notable enough, this title could redirect to the author's article). LadyofShalott 03:05, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Nancy Rue. LadyofShalott 04:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Useless article. Gives no information at all. Jared-Phill (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 05:01, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σ τ c. 00:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Nancy Rue. Not a shred of evidence that this fictional character has any out-of-universe notability. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 03:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as the reasonable solution. Normally we would redirect to the book, but as she is the character is an entire series, a redirect to the author is more rational. No reason no keep as a separate article, no reason not to have a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 01:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Nancy Rue, providing references can be found. Simply redirecting to Nancy Rue will cause confusion as there is currently nothing on Rue's page about Lily Robbins or the Lily Series. --Wavehunter (talk) 02:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no verifiable evidence of notability to meet the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:43, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redirecting to Nancy Rue would not make sense, and that article does not even mention this subject, nor is there anything to indicate that this subject is important enough to Nancy Rue to warrant a mention in that article. Nor is there any evidence of standalone notability. Rlendog (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.