Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linton Country School
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of schools in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region#Palmerston North City. Tone 13:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Linton Country School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable school. Also, primary schools are generally not given their own article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a non-notable elementary school. Or redirect to Palmerston North, New Zealand if there would be any value in that. Carrite (talk) 19:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable primary school. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - blank, and redirect to List of schools in the Manawatu-Wanganui Region#Palmerston North City where it is already listed. There is no policy or guideline that primary schools are inherently notable, but as redirection is often a preferred solution: Sometimes an unsuitable article may have a title that would make a useful redirect. In these cases, deletion is not required; any user can boldly redirect to another article (policy), non notable schools that are proven to exist are generally not deleted; instead, according to long established precedent demonstrated by 100s of AfD closures, and summarised in WP:OUTCOMES, an objective essay that "is intended to supplement Wikipedia:Deletion policy", they are redirected to the article about the school district (USA), or to the article about the locality, or to a list article. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the template on the redirect page as it populates an important category. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect or Delete. This school -- with zero independent gbooks hits, and three passing mention gnews hits, lacks the RS coverage that would -- in light of precedent -- support notability such as would lead us to keep it as a stand-alone article.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.