Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Air Flight 386

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Boeing_737#Accidents_and_incidents. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:02, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lion Air Flight 386

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OK good article but is it notable - probably not, just another runeay over-run, no fatalities, no lasting effects such as procedures stc., interesting but not encyclopaedic Petebutt (talk) 05:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Boeing_737#Accidents_and_incidents and 2002 in aviation, 2-3 sentences there may suffice. Brandmeister^talk 12:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Brandmeister, along with perhaps a mention in the Lion Air article. While worthy of mention in type/airline/airport articles, this sort of accident does not rise to the level of notability that is needed for a stand-alone article. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Comment if this discussion results in anything other than keep, the summary at Sultan Syarif Kasim II International Airport#Accidents and incidents should be expanded. Thryduulf (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.