Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipo-flavonoid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lipo-flavonoid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A dietary supplement. The article was speedily deleted as WP:G11 (wholly promotional). Discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 January 16 concluded that AfD should make this decision. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. Sandstein 09:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on pubmed about this term. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I wasn't aware of the deletion review. Deb (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Artspam. Coverage is mostly from manufacturer. Lacks significant coverage to meet GNG. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete pseudomedical dietary supplement advertising; a perfect example, actually. ooo science-y! Jytdog (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.