Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Curtis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Curtis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill political staffer fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Having a job in the White House does not confer notability. KidAd • SPEAK 06:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Seem pl ez ^{{{ping}} me} 13:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not every person on the White House political/policy staff is notable. That is what we would have to set notability at to class Curtis as notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 05:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.