Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa haynes
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lisa haynes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Contested PROD. Notability not established, too few google hits. Reads like a personal homepage. roleplayer 01:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A couple of references in the article (one of which,[1], may not pass WP:RS since the home page says "Content is posted freely by web site members and may or may not reflect the opinions, goals or mission of Best Friends Animal Society"), certainly not enough to pass WP:BIO. Such coverage as there is concentrates mostly on "Save our Strays" organization. The article in Burlington Free Press[2] does mention that she is a former professional wrestler. It is possible that there is some additional coverage related to her wrestling career, which could change things in terms of notability. However, I did not find anything relevant by googling. Nsk92 (talk) 01:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - redirect and rename to Save Our Strays. A quick Google found several WP:RS news articles about the organization: St. Petersburg Times article, another St. Petersburg Times article, Burlington Free Press article; the organization and its founder has also been supported and publicized by Purina® Pro Plan®'s Rally to Rescue™ program (courtesy link hosted elsewhere) that helps worthy pet rescue organizations. Save Our Strays is not a major organization, but it's notable and verifiable enough for an article. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I might support that, but it looks like there are multiple organizations with that same name, including one in Australia. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not a bio, just spam for a local animal welfare group. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable RJFJR (talk) 16:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.