Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dublin Bus Routes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Dublin Bus Routes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTRAVEL, no notable routes, article is unsourced and extremely poorly formatted and written Ajf773 (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed. The list is just chaotic and really doesn't provide any useful or helpful information regarding the bus lines. 201020132015hawks (talk) 02:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not, by policy, a repository for directories or for lists without contextual information (see WP:NOTDIRECTORY, esp. #4 and #7). Bakazaka (talk) 04:07, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE and WP:TRAVELGUIDE. Guliolopez (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on WP:TNT/WP:GNG grounds (as currently unsourced). I strongly contest WP:NOTTRAVEL, as there is absolutely nothing in this article which would be of any use to anyone attempting to navigate the city of Dublin, but I agree it shouldn't be in the encyclopedia as it stands. SportingFlyer T·C 11:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This isn't Wikivoyage. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 13:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There's a valid deletion argument presented, but it's hard to see the signal for the noise. "Currently unsourced" is not remotely a deletion rationale, and the nominator should have stopped typing after their second comma as the rest of their comment is completely irrelevant here. Please try harder to comply with deletion and editing policy, by focusing just on the content's potential rather than just what you're seeing in the page's current version.
One consideration may be whether any of this information should be summarized/condensed/retained in the parent article Dublin Bus, as the route section there is just a link to this page. The page title may be redirected as well, though it is miscapitalized. There is also Category:Dublin Bus routes that should be listed at CFD as it has no true content apart from this list. postdlf (talk) 14:07, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I could have summerised it to you in just five letters: WP:NOT. Ajf773 (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This doesn't belong here under WP:NOTTRAVEL. Maybe put this in Wikivoyage? Tosi | he/him | ^t/_c 21:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't delete Crocodile Dippy —Preceding undated comment added 11:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC+1)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.