Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Forgotten Realms cities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Forgotten Realms cities

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article for the collection of non-notable topics that do not justify a content split. There is no reason a general encyclopedia needs to list every fictional city in a work. There exists Faerûn to cover the fictional world in general, assuming that article can even establish its own notability. TTN (talk) 22:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GAMEGUIDE Chetsford (talk) 05:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nearly all of the information here is unsourced, or sourced to primary books and publications. The one secondary source being used is only being used to support one piece of trivia for one of the cities, which does not really help the notability of the stand alone list. As the vast majority of the listed locations are not independently notable, and there are no reliable, secondary sources discussing the items on the list as a set, it fails WP:LISTN. Rorshacma (talk) 10:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm a stickler for WP:V. Waggie (talk) 05:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.