Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fushigi Yûgi characters
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Fushigi Yûgi. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of Fushigi Yûgi characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
More unsourced fictography and cruft. Is this an encyclopedia or an anime fansite? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Anime and manga. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Fushigi Yûgi or delete unless sources indicating notability for the grouping can be provided. Similar to Fushigi Yûgi: Byakko Senki and Fushigi Yûgi: Genbu Kaiden, the very core characters should be briefly described in a few sentences each, while everything else is cut. It really depends on if the current content can be salvaged, or if it should just be redone from scratch. TTN (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: An AfD for a similar listicle over at The Story of Saiunkoku resulted in the character list being redirected to the main article. A much shortened character list has since been added. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Fushigi_Yûgi#Plot. The list is 100% fancruft, poorly referenced, but a short list of key characters does belong in the plot summary of the main work (which currently has nothing on this). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.