Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Laotian Americans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe if this were "The Laotian Experience in America," it could be encyclopedic, but as a simple list of Laotians, it's not. PRODed and contested. Erik the Rude 01:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge right back where this came from: Laotian American - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete. I took the material for this article out of the Laotian American article so that the Laotion American article would match all the other 'F00 American' articles in the Category:Ethnic groups in the United States (no article includes a list of people) and placed it in the list article so the list article would match all the other list articles found in Category:Lists of American people by ethnic or national origin. The Laotion list should be treated in the same way as all the other lists. Thanks Hmains 04:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Why should we treat Laos different? Actually, the smaller the country seems to make the list more interesting/notable. --MarsRover
- Keep notable — RJH (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems to be precedent Crazynas 15:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Just as a note to all, I have removed outright two entries as inappropriate and of the remaining six I have prod'ded entried 3, 4, and 6. If the prods or AfD's hold up, you'll have a list of three. That's awful short to be maintained on its own. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 17:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - added several more people to list --MarsRover 04:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Just as a note to all, I have removed outright two entries as inappropriate and of the remaining six I have prod'ded entried 3, 4, and 6. If the prods or AfD's hold up, you'll have a list of three. That's awful short to be maintained on its own. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 17:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT. —Aiden 17:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dominick (TALK) 18:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Category:Laotian Americans. The list doesn't offer much more than the category. Deleteme42 20:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Hmains and MarsRover. If we delete this, we should delete all the other articles of the same nature, which clearly is not an option. -- PageantUpdater 22:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Appears to be a worthwhile article, and one which is expanded upon may well be more so. --Wisden17 23:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Question When I was looking through some of the other list of ethinicities in America, I came across an item on the talk page of the List of Bandladeshi Americans article stating that there was recently a discussion of a potential policy dealing with these types of lists. However, so far, I can't find the discussion to see the outcome. Does anyone here know anything about this discussion? ScottW 00:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep useful list. Grue 10:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.