Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Luxembourg women's international footballers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep, no chance of success. Fram (talk) 09:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

List of Luxembourg women's international footballers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary list... Also no notability has been established. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Also nominating the following for the same reasons:[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. People representing their countries at full international level in a widely-covered sport. Bizarre nomination. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 22:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:33, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yeah ... I don't understand this at all. What is the difference between this and the equivalent pages for the men's teams? Black Kite (talk) 23:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why is List of Luxembourg international footballers worth keeping, but not a women's list? Froztbyte (talk) 02:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. As creator of one, and per all above keeps. Sort of list I use all the time, contains quick reference and additional information to categories and concerns notable subjects. To nominate under premise 'notability has not been established ' is spurious given that every person listed nominally passes notability criteria under WP.footyn - certainly on the lists I use. Also fail to see why list these and not the equivalent men's lists; except the almost certainty that the men's list nominations would likely be snow closed ClubOranje^T 05:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all A list of notable individuals representing their nation at the top level for their sports. All could easily become featured lists, and aid navigation with the categories, per WP:CLN. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.