Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mew singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mew discography. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mew singles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unnecessary list article when Mew discography exists and suffices. No other band or musical artist has a "list of singles". This seems to have been created to display track listings and infoboxes as if to show every single as a stub article? No secondary sources apart from one referring to an album. Lazz _R 00:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:31, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:31, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:31, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back into Mew discography (or vice versa?), or at least redirect. As far as I can make out, the articles for each Mew single were merged into a discography as a result of this AfD back in 2010. In 2015, this page was moved to it's current title and a new discography was created. We do not need two discographies for this band, and at least the newer version follows the typical format. PC78 (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the main contributors to this (sizeable) article may not have been notified about this AfD, so courtesy pinging @Arbitrarily0, Mayast, and ВікіПЕДист: in case they wish to weigh in. Colin M (talk) 19:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect Agree with PC78. Legion X (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am sympathetic towards the desire to include a complete detailed discography, but how to do this is something that this project has never really got to grips with. The number of different versions of many of the singles, and different B-sides/additional tracks makes this one difficult to achieve without a separate article, but the detail is excessive here. The infoboxes are pretty redundant, and make the article look cluttered, but I don't think the detail here would fit well within the band's discography article. --Michig (talk) 10:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.