Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay activists
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was MOVE to List of LGBT rights activists. JIP | Talk 07:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List with no clear inclusion criteria (are these gay rights activists or activists who happen to be gay?), probably mostly unverifiable, flamebait. Sandstein 06:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- comment this list could never be complete there are probably millions of people who fit this catagory. Tobyk777 06:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, state inclusion criteria, and verify periodically. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.This is the sort of thing better done with a category, and we already have one, namely "Category:LGBT rights activists". dbtfztalk 06:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Changing my opinion to rename per mikka. dbtfztalk 06:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to List of LGBT rights activists (or restrict to it), as suggested. Criteria are pretty much clear: wikipedia article (a wikipedia standard for lists), which clearly states that the person is notably "gay rights activist", not just walks gay pride parades. As for category, we had this talk here, like, three thousand times: lists are not categories and they peacefully coexist.mikka (t) 06:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per mikka. Chairman S. Talk 06:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per Mikka Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 07:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Better to have a category.
- Rename and Rework I feel there needs to be some context as to why there people are included in the list. A one sentance summmary, something beyond being a pure list. joshbuddytalk 08:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename agree with Mikka. -- Samir ∙ T C 10:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per mikka. --Terence Ong 13:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per mikka. Eivind 19:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move and rework. —-- That Guy, From That Show! (talk) 2006-03-10 04:43Z
- Move and fix as mikka suggests. ProhibitOnions 23:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.