Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of waterfalls in Iran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of waterfalls in Iran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vastly unsourced list with a handful of bluelinks but no sourcing for the many, many waterfalls claimed as 'the most important'. There's simply no way of knowing how important or even IF they truly, well, are... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ten blue links, so a valid list. Dream Focus 19:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Valid directory for the entries that have articles, complementing Category:Waterfalls of Iran, provided that all the non-notable entries are removed. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a good list. Obviously the article needs to have much less editorializing, including removing whatever waterfalls are "most important". As to whether I can find RS... I'm afraid I can't read Farsi. A couple of Google hits to questionable sources like [1] [2]. [3] is an actual news website listing it (friend says it's titled "6 waterfalls and pictures" and looks reasonably reliable). [4] is a book titled "The book of Iranian waterfalls". Easy GNG pass. Ovinus (talk) 21:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep
- Wikipedia:SALAT: This list fulfills objective as it is limited in size and topic and is not trivial and is encyclopedic and related to human knowledge
- Wikipedia:LISTPURP #1: This list fulfills requirement because the list structured around a theme and is annotated.
- Wikipedia:LISTCRITERIA: This list fits this criteria because listed items fit its narrow scope and are topically relevant making it encyclopedic, comprehensive (and possibly) complete.
- Wikipedia:NOTDIR#1: This list does not contravene this policy as it is not a loosely associated topic and its entries are relevant because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic.
- Wikipedia:CSC: This list fulfills this criteria explicitly because most or all of the listed items do not warrant independent articles. Djflem (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously, the article provides a nice introduction and guide to the topic. I rather believe the editors/authors are correct in which are tge more important ones but sure, tag with call for sourcing. Having 10 blue links is fine, but none at all are required. The more important items without articles currently should be redlinks, with footnotes to sources, indicating where articles ate needed....--Doncram (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but non-notable waterfalls can be removed from the list. desmay (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article presents a fair content of waterfalls in Iran.--Navid100P (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.