Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live in the 21st Century

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article may now be redirected, if any editor wishes. Mz7 (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Live in the 21st Century (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whether you want to consider this an album or DVD (or both!), I believe it fails GNG. Mainly because I could find reviews of it in reliable sources. There is no points on ALBUM it would satisfy as well. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, the nomination was made before the ban, so it is still valid. Richard3120 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion was created before the user was indefinitely blocked. As such, it remains a valid nomination; it is not some sort of attempt to circumvent the block.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The band may be famous, but there is no indication that this release is famous, or that there are any reliable sources discussing it. Richard3120 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.