Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd shepherd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lloyd shepherd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Autobiographical entry - no assertion of notability by WP:BIO Patstuarttalk|edits 04:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is pretty clearly WP:AB by someone directing traffic to his blog (which contains quite a similar biography).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Markdsgraham (talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 January 2007
- Delete per nom. Fails "I breathe so I should be on WP" --Richhoncho 11:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no neutral sources Alf photoman 15:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Now Since his position appers to be influential in determining the news content for a major medium, I feel that there may be potential for notablility if we can get some sources. I've posted a note at his talk page. Unfortunately there are several people with the same name which are recognized in Google, so research will be tedious. --Kevin Murray 20:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Markdsgraham; the article was created by a WP:SPA Lloydshep that is likely a WP:COI. The two people mentioned as senior to Lloyd (Jon Gisby and Simon Waldman) dont have articles, so why should Lloyd. John Vandenberg 22:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.