Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logical partition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And move as discussed. Sandstein 20:31, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logical partition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TWODAB: Because there are only two entries (one of them has less than half a line worth of info) using hatnote disambiguation is more convenient. Codename Lisa (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move only entry with article to primary topic with hatnote to entry meeting MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 13:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; that is actually what I ultimately intended by this nomination: "Logical partition" dab page gets deleted, "Logical partition (virtual computing platform)" is moved to "Logical partition" and a {{for|disk partition type|Disk partitioning#Extended partition}} tag is placed on top of the new "Logical partition". Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 14:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and move precisely per nom. bd2412 T 04:47, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.