Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokesh Umak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 11:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lokesh Umak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:AUTHOR, both of his works have not been reviewed by anyone and are non-notable, a google search for anything except social media and goodreads-type stuff was also unsuccessful. 15 (talk) 12:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 15 (talk) 12:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. I googled his name and only found links to his website, social media and Amazon page for his books. Eevee01^(talk) 16:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not show notability. Maybe one day the page will be well written and sourced and it will show notability. Until then delete it.Topjur01 (talk) 23:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't qualify WP:NAUTHOR. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This could be deleted as WP:A7 also. The article provides no assertion of notability. Sources are all self published and I couldn't find any reliable sources. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable and probably paid-for spam. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 12:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This probably could have been speedied under WP:A7. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.