Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lon Safko
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 08:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Lon Safko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO as I'm unable to find any substantial coverage in RS. Specifically, I can't find anything to support the claim that he developed the first voice recognition software and the only recent coverage I can find is passing mentions of him being a social media consultant, but I can't find anything with more detail. SmartSE (talk) 13:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 23:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 23:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 23:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 23:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Although I am undecided about notability, Smartse, this Smithsonian Institution web page verifies that he was a pioneer in attempts to commercialize voice recognition technology. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Cullen328: I had a look through that before but I don't think it is much use as a source or for demonstrating notability since it was donated to the Smithsonian by the subject. Wouldn't there be at least some independent references if the claims were correct? SmartSE (talk) 13:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 17:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 17:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience t 01:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience t 01:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.