Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lou Brown
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lou Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Dicey neologism - a Google search doesn't confirm its definition. A speedy delete was swatted away -- let's roll this and see what comes up. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO, WP:NOR and WP:DICDEF, plus no sources are provided to back this incredibly trivial information. Canjth (talk) 01:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Canjth. Wonder how the speedy misfired Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 02:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete db-nocontext. JuJube (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I tried the original speedy as db-nonsense but it was declined as not nonsense. I suppose that technically it's not. 07:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:OR, WP:DICDEF, and possibly WP:CSD#A3. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Craps. Tezkag72 (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Canjth effectively covers the relevant policies. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.