Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Fatio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Fatio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG Finlan Bendbow-Rendeck (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and New Jersey. AllyD (talk) 06:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Author of award-winning book, noted in The Wee Web: appears notable. PamD 07:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Switzerland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:CREATIVE#3. The Happy Lion series is a significant and well known body of work. pburka (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am convinced by the argument made by User:PamD CT55555(talk) 18:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The Happy Lion is a well-known work by Fatio. She easily passes WP:AUTHOR. Thilsebatti (talk) 18:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The scope and breadth of sources here and the nature of the books she published demonstrate that the notability standard has been met. Alansohn (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.