Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lourdes Duque Baron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Snowballs have a better chance than this WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lourdes Duque Baron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person fails notability because insufficient independent sources exist. An internet search found only press releases related to personal appearances and book signing events to promote her new book. Further, the text of the article is a copy-paste of those press releases. Recommend deletion. Senator2029 leave me a message 04:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT with no assertion of notability per WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR, 3rd-runner up in a national beauty contest, etc. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Evident WP:Conflict of interest by article's creator, whose sole contribution has been repeated creation of three articles like this about people promoted by WorldWideVital Marketing, as noted in one of the sources currently listed. Altered Walter (talk) 11:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails to meet our standards of notability. Long and disgusting history of shameless spamming and publicity efforts on her behalf are of course irrelevant to the discussion, but should be noted for the record. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT and WP:COI. Not enough coverage in reliable sources, and creator appears to have a conflict of interest. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.