Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love at the Thanksgiving Day Parade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love at the Thanksgiving Day Parade

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 15:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are many, many Hallmark films. Sometimes one will gain coverage enough to pass NFILM, but the majority will typically get only the smallest smattering of attention - or none - before they vanish into the cornucopia of holiday films. This seems to be one of the latter, as I can't really find anything other than typical TV listings. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hallmark films are a dime a dozen, and we need good sources to show they are notable. A trailer is not an indepdent source, and IMDB is not reliable, so we have no reliable sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the nom as it fails WP:NFILM. Pahiy (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.