Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Any delete votes have been changed to keep per WP:HEY (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 00:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. JTZegers (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately, there were no mentions found. Inside I kinda wanna keep it, but I can't find anything that could be considered a reliable source. Less Unless (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Thank to the users who managed to find the sources, where I have failed, I am changing my vote as now I can justify my inner voice with the actual facts. Less Unless (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (sort of). It's mentioned in The Complete Catalog of British Cars 1895-1975, but there's not a lot of information about it. It could be added as an entry in a disambiguation page (along with Lúcar and Lucar (surname)) or hatnote (the latter if Lucar (surname) is moved here). Clarityfiend (talk) 23:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found three thin sources that confirm the facts. The middle source points to a June 1913 article in a publication called "Autocar", and also has a picture. It's not much, but small stubs on old items aren't hurting anyone as long as the facts are confirmed (personal view). I also removed the vernacular description of crimp terminals, as this is not a disambiguation page. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In general we keep models and marques of automobile. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep It's not much, but just about enough to justify a stub, I think. And given the fan base for this kind of stuff, chances for eventual expansion aren't that bad. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.