Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucile F. Aly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lucile F. Aly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial accomplishments: co-ed. of medium importancet anthologies, but thats not enough for WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR DGG ( talk ) 07:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly a worthy scholar but GS citation record is too slender for major impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything nontrivial about her other than "Neihardt's biographer", and that's not enough. The article is completely unsourced; the biography could be sourced to this review, but the article would still fail WP:BIO1E, and one academic-journal book review isn't enough for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She wrote a biography, but not evidently one that got widely reviewed, and she co-edited a few works. Nothing here is enough to pass GNG or the guidelines for notability for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's still nothing particularly convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 01:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.