Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucille Sharp
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation once she passes the GNG — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lucille Sharp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An actor. Entire resume is a TV documentary. She has an upcoming role as a maid in Downton Abbey that isn't to be shown until late this year. Only references I can find on her is short blurbs announcing her Downton role. Bgwhite (talk) 08:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 08:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable yet (WP:NACTOR), when she is famous we can recreate the page. CodeTheorist (talk) 12:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)}[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no coverage, fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BIO--William Thweatt TalkContribs 00:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I found a few sources but nothing that I was certain was exercising editorial control and, more importantly, nothing that talked about her abilities as an actor -- merely that she had been cast in this high-profile role on Downton Abbey. I'm fairly sure she will be notable in a short time, although it's not clear how important the role will be to the production, but in the meantime the article doesn't quite meet Wikipedia's standards. Ubelowme U Me 15:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.