Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigi Lovaglio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luigi Lovaglio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:QatarStarsLeague (creator) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). I have looked at the refs in article and on the web, and the while he is mentioned in media it is either in passing (ex. the Polish ref added [1] is misleading, it is not about him - it is about the bank ownership, and the subject is only mention briefly in the context that his job as the CEO is likely safe) or in the recurring context of being the most highly paid bank CEO in Poland, something that is discussed in passing in major newspapers, and a bit more in depth in tabloids. Note that there is no in-depth coverage, the only articles about him are few tabloid rants about "this Italian person works in the Polish bank and is earning a lot of $$$, yadda yadda". I don't think that this sufficient to be notable, and being a CEO of a medium bank is not enough to meet WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME. Lastly, pl wiki mentions he received an Italian government award, but it seems minor and not sufficient for notability. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I've been watching this article since the PROD and I quite honestly concur with everything, there's simply no actual notability or significance and we should not mistake it as otherwise when it's clear this is only an existing business listing. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- notability is not inherited from the companies the subject worked for. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.