Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luscious Cosmetics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 10:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luscious Cosmetics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brochure article. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 08:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Pakistan. Madeline (part of me) 12:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NCORP per nom, also probably an article by a UPE, so TNT. There are two decent sources (allure and glamour), so I'm sure this might be notable, but it still needs a "blow it up and start again" approach if it is to remain. FrederalBacon (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.