Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxembourg–Moldova relations
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Luxembourg–Moldova relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
one of the most random combinations I'm to find. text says it all There is no common border between Moldova and Luxembourg. The number of Luxembourgish in Moldova and of Moldavians in Luxembourg is insignificant besides football this is the only article I could find about actual relations [1] but even then Moldova really only speaks to Luxembourg in a Moldova-EU context. LibStar (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the article was created by this guy in an attempt to "prove" a connection between medieval Moldavia and the modern Republic of Moldova. POV-pushing as well as deeply un-notable. - Biruitorul Talk 06:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N, WP:RS, WP:GNG, WP:NOTDIR, yadda yadda. --BlueSquadronRaven 14:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There are potentially over 37,000 bilateral relations articles. Many of them will be notable, but this ain't one of them. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 02:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, and merging these articles like this into the "diplomacy of..." articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this unsourced stub. I find no reliable sources on my own that discuss this bilateral relationship.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.