Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyon Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 08:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lyon Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a voice actor, which just asserts that he exists, lists roles and sources them only to IMDb and another IMDb-style voice actor database, without showing any evidence of reliable source coverage about him at all. As always, every working actor in existence does not get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because roles are listed — he must be the subject of reliable source coverage about him to pass the notability standard for actors. Bearcat (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NACTOR. I could not locate reliable secondary sources that establish notability for the subject. Comatmebro (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:49, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 01:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.