Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyrics007
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Even after discounting the nomination by a now blocked sockpuppet. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lyrics007 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. DJFace1 (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, no indication of notability – Thjarkur (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:WEBCRIT as this website does not appear to have received significant coverage from multiple reliable sources under either of its names Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no indication of notability. Having an Alexa rating >100000 is a sign of non-notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet requirements for either WP:WEBCRIT or WP:GNG --Kemalcan (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.