Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMM-2011
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Sergei Mavrodi. Further discussion is unlikely to reach a better solution. DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- MMM-2011 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm nominating this for deletion. It's probably the worst article I've ever seen on Wikipedia. It's clearly a shill and out to sell whatever product this is supposed to be, nevermind the generally awful translation and that it's sprinkled with random emotes. Wikipedia really doesn't need this. --93.200.25.68 (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- An IP editor tagged the article for AfD and left a nominating statement on the article talk page [1]. I have copied it above and completed the nominating process on the IP editor's behalf. Monty845 02:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - subject notability seems out of question. Article needs improvement, not deletion. --SPGremlin (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
— SPGremlin (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Dramatically trim and merge with subject's bio The nominator is wrong on some accounts, particularly that this article is "out to sell [something]" because it's clearly about a Ponzi scheme that has been busted and well-publicized. The subject seems notable but we don't need an article about both the Ponzi scheme and its perpetrator. But there is a lot of material that needs to be trimmed from this article if it's kept or merged as there appears to be quite a bit of OR and a few POV issues as well. ElKevbo (talk) 17:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Yeah needs better prose and not deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- note to closing admin the generic vote above is a spree of 7 keep !votes in 10 minutes by this editor. LibStar (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Sergei Mavrodi. We don't need two separate articles about the same scam. "MMM-2011" seems like a much less likely search term than the name of the perpetrator. --MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.