Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magocracy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Magocracy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NEO as a non-notable neologism term. Not many references discussing the notion. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:09, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable neologism, more of a TVTropes topic. I'm unimpressed by the 2008 arguments to keep, and the "potential for development" doesn't seem to have turned into anything. All of the references have fallen out of the article since then. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- unsourced D&D fancruft. As is usual for keep and improve results at AfD, the promised improvements have proven not to be possible. Reyk _YO! 09:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTNEO WP:INUNIVERSE-only topic. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.