Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maito Santos

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 January 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maito Santos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly fails WP:GNG despite playing only three minutes in a WP:NFOOTY league. HawkAussie (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG which is more important than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:38, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found two sources [1] [2] that may pass GNG. While they establish his notability, it is as a male model. ミラ P 17:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 17:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet our [[WP:GNG|general notability guidelines. If there's more about him as per our reliable sources guidlines that can be verified, please provide. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definitely does fail GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.