Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mama ayser center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Baghdad#Education. There is a weak consensus that the sources aren't quite enough to support an stand-alone article. I am redirecting rather than deleting because of the precedent at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 02:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mama_ayser_center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient reliable, independent and secondary source coverage. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable primary school. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Baghdad#Education per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, with merging if and as apppropriate to provide a mention, which should have been done instead of AfD. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - (Per the reliable sources, the name of the Wikipedia article should be Mama Ayser). Surprisingly, there's some information in English language sources: World Today June 29, 2004 and Reuters July 2, 2010. There probably is other source material in Iraq language reliable sources. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.