Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manji Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Consensus to keep Arguments for deletion were either refuted or not based in policy. Chillum 02:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manji Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google Books offer a lot of sources needed to develop this article in accordance with Wikipedia requirements. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination and HEY. CutestPenguin (Talk) 15:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you explain what exactly is so wrong with the content of the article instead of pointing to an acronym? --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vejvančický, unless you tag User:Cutest Penguin, he/she is unlikely to respond. WP:HEY is often linked at AfD, and from a click it shows that the article would need so much verification/improvement that they can't se that they would be convinced to vote keep. Boleyn (talk) 07:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: I forgot to notify Cutest Penguin, thanks for doing that. Yes, I know what WP:HEY means. To me, it is a comfortable way of argumenting, unfortunately lacking constructive thinking, imagination, and real work. It is similar to repetitive AfD nomination statements. I'll try to add more references to the article and correct/verify some statements in it. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added sources satisfy WP:BASIC and WP:MUSICBIO 1 and, probably, 7. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep Added sources seem to be satisfactory. I wish people here could properly explain their rationale for deleting or keeping without constantly referring to Wikipedia policy acronyms all the time. That is one of the biggest turn-offs on Wikipedia. Enough of the bloody acronyms.--ЗAНИA ^talk ^{WB talk}] 20:27, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.