Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjinder Sandhu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manjinder Sandhu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on press releases rather than independent sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing to suggest meeting WP:GNG, poorly sourced self-promotion. Melcous (talk) 23:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I'm unable find coverage in reliable sources that would be sufficiently detailed to warrant an article. Does not meet the requirements of WP:BIO. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete puff piece lacking all traits that indicate notability.104.163.147.121 (talk) 00:13, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He is a medical director and the article lists membership of some professional associations. Of the sources currently used: two are webpages selling his services, one looks like a churnalism story on World heart day where he is quoted from a press release, a further source has him named as the source of an explanation within an article on a new type of stent, the fifth is a journal article where he is listed as a co-author. Notability has not been demonstrated when judged against WP:BASIC or WP:ACADEMIC. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Doc James rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.