Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manly Fall, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manly Fall, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNIS is the only citation and it says that Manly Fall was a Fall, not a community. No post office. GBooks has hits only for the now former waterfalls. Newspapers.com had one hit for a mining claim at that location. Note that Manly Fall no longer exists. Cxbrx (talk) 21:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Blatant misrepresentation of the sole source, GNG is not met. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly was never a community if it was ever anything at all Spiderone 23:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.