Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansour Hedayati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mansour Hedayati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

effectively unsourced ~~BLP~~ biography, as Wikipedia is not a suitable source. Also fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 18:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep im expanding this and i will bring the sources . please let us expand article . i just start to expand the article Amir Muhammad 19:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have at least a week to provide sources and make sure that they prove his notability. The Banner talk 19:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The subject has been dead for 7 years, so the article is not a biogrpahy of a living person (BLP).John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- You are right, so I changed BLP in biography The Banner talk 21:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it seems there is a blindfold deletion cuz its not a BLP(Biography of living person). it can be a vandalism if there is no evidence for this wrong purpose. Amir Muhammad 17:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems like there are far more sources when searching the Farsi name than the English one. Notability may come down to non-English sources. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:10, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the accomplishments of the subject of this article seem notable enough. More sources should be added though. Inter&anthro (talk) 01:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Inter&anthro: Do you understand that we don't decide if the accomplishments are enough but if a subject "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"? Can you show how this criteria has been met? Doug Weller talk 10:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I'm afraid--I can't even see what he did, let alone gauge his importance without secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.