Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Kronemeyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Kronemeyer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article, with most of the content unsourced, including unsourced claims for personal influence ofn more important people. Most of the refs are about his company, not himself; the ones that do are notices or PR. (as a striking example of self-indulgent promotional content, note the portrait legend) DGG ( talk ) 07:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

____________________

In response to the nomination for deletion, modified the article (deleted content with no references and used a neutral point of view in the writing). Article should be of good quality to stay in Wikipedia. (OmarMoncada (talk) 17:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing he has done as a real estate/toruism promoter rises to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.