Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Uson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Uson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article by a WP:SPA about a 17-year-old Colombian DJ that fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. He also happens to be a tennis player, but he fails WP:NSPORT on this account as well. None of the references in the article are reliable sources, and no good independent sources have been found. Richard3120 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments.

We have and re-organized

The text and citations to make it more clear that on that, in fact, Marco´s Biography meets al least, 4 wikipedia´s criteria of notability for musicians

Particularly:

1) In accordance with Wikipedia's standard or criteria of notability 2, Marco Uson has music that has been published on worldwide music charts. His tracks have been in the TOP 100 Marco Uson of Beatport, the worlds largest electronic music store. In fact, he is also one of the very few Colombians appearing in this chart (this is very reliable for a electronic music lover). Marco also has been in the TOP 100 of the iTunes Store in Spain. Verifiable citation: (all of this can this can ve proved on Beatport and on BeatStas the statistics web page of the store).

2) In accordance with Wikipedia's standard or criteria of notability 1 Marco´s musical productions have been reviewed in independent and recognized magazines, specialized in electronic music as “Faze Mag (print version) (https://www.facebook.com/djmarcouson/posts/2188448444723341)” and "Electronic Grooves” (. Verifiable citation: https://electronicgroove.com/show/premieres/marco-uson-chaos-snippet-resopal-schallware/, https://www.facebook.com/djmarcouson/posts/2188448444723341,

3) In accordance with Wikipedia's standard or criteria of notability 12 Marco Uson has also been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio network. In this regard we would like to mention Marco´s live-set broadcast in one the most influential radio station of Colombia called “ Radionica ” . This special Broadcast was done on the colombian radio channel 99.1 and via Facebook live https://www.facebook.com/radionicafm/videos/419703391894251

4) In accordance with wikipedia standard or criteria of notability 5 Marco Uson has published in independent label such as RESOPAL SCHALLWARE , with a history of Electronic music since 2002 roster of performers such as Acid Pauli, Johannes Heil, John Tejada, Oliver Koletzki whom are independently notable and part of wikipedia. https://labelsbase.net/label/resopal-schallware

In summary, Marco´s Biography, does meets at least 4 criteria for notability in music, and this can be verified by the reliable and public sources we have cited in the text.

Therefore We have re-edited the wikipedia article so that notability is verified.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookingpensartes (talk • contribs)

@Bookingpensartes: unfortunately, none of your changes meet the notability criteria.

1) Per WP:BADCHARTS, Beatport is not a recognised chart as it is a single vendor chart.

2) Faze Mag is an acceptable source, but the link you provide doesn't work (for me, at least). The only link to Mr. Uson that I can find on Faze Mag is a listing he provided of his current top ten favourite tracks that he plays - this doesn't provide us with any information about him. Electronic Groove has not yet been reviewed to see if it can be accepted as a reliable source, but the review of the track has no author and sounds like it has been provided by the artist's management rather than reviewed by the website.

3) I live in Colombia and can confirm that Radiónica is one of the major radio stations for non-traditional Latin music in the country. It only broadcasts in and around the country's major cities, but I'm not sure if this qualifies as a national radio station if it has a network across part of the country. Additionally, the broadcast consisted of a one-hour mix alongside three other DJs. Many DJs across the world have had a mix played on a radio station somewhere, so this isn't anything out of the ordinary, and this normally isn't considered a "substantial broadcast segment".

4) Resopall Schallware is not considered a significant record label. Richard3120 (talk) 03:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The use of the term "we", makes this very suspect of paid editing. On top of that, not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't pass WP:MUSICBIO.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on account of subject failing WP:NMUSICIAN. There are no sources to support notability. There are video clips but, per WP:ELP, these are not acceptable since they're not, for instance, a segment from a well-known television news show, or an official video channel from a major publisher. Then there's a couple of Facebook pages, but Facebook is not an acceptable source for notability, per WP:NOYT. And so on. The claim that the subject meets specific WP:NMUSICIAN criteria has already been refuted above by Richard3120. -The Gnome (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.