Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Gill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (soft) slakrtalk / 03:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Gill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG. Primary references given are from the subject's website, and those that aren't only mention Gill in passing. Multiple tags since 2011. Buffalutheran (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Only local press coverage (not in major cities). No evidence of notability for his TV show A Moment of Life - hosting a local TV show doesn't confer notability. Doesn't meet WP:GNG and no evidence of any other reason for notability. To be notable, would need coverage in multiple sources in national media or at least media covering a significant area (e.g. New York City press). Posting unsourced info about his divorce may violate WP policies. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.