Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Kart: Source
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Source mods. Consensus that page notability is not established. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mario Kart: Source (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was already AfDd once, and despite reaching a delete consensus was apparently never deleted. Granted, there's a couple of additional sources now, but they barely go further than saying the project exists. The vast majority of the sources are either primary, self-published, or both. And to top it all off, the mod was never even finished or released. It seems like it pretty plainly fails WP:GNG no matter how you try to look at it. Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Source mods - not enough sourcing or content to warrant its own spinout. Sergecross73 msg me 13:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect Per Sergecross and nom, we can merge a few lines to the list. As for the history of the article, it was deleted following the original AFD, but later restored, user draftified, and then pushed back to mainspace. -- ferret (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Redirect WP:NVG is not satisfied. No
significant commentary
on the subject, and very limited independent sourcing to begin with. It's not a particularly likely search term, but redirects are cheap, given the existence List of Source mods as a good target redirecting edges out deletion. Not seeing any reason to merge, the list already has an entry, and there doesn't seem to be anything notable enough to be added to the existing summary. 74.73.230.72 (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.