Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marios Antoniades

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marios Antoniades

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One 3-minute appearance in a fully professional league, although it technically satisfies WP:NFOOTY, it doesn't seem to make the subject more notable than before. Also fails WP:GNG too due to lack of significant media coverage. I PRODed it at first, but then I realized it's not a good idea, so I'm running it through AfD instead. – Kosm1 fent 12:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Kosm1 fent 12:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I only was able to find one interview with Antoniades (in Greek) and a number of articles that simply mention him in match reports (mostly U21 and friendly matches). I don't think this article meets the GNG and the common sense thing to do is wait until we can write a more substantive article when (if) significant coverage in reliable sources exist. Jogurney (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - let's show some WP:COMMONSENSE here. 3 minutes on a sporting field is not enough to be considered notable; fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 12:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly fails WP:GNG. While it technically passes WP:NSPORT, I agree with what has already been said: Commonsense is definitely called for here. There's a reasonable chance that he'll be notable in the future, but not now. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: His 3 minutes of playing do not make him notable. SL93 (talk) 20:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per SL93. →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 02:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.